Investment Scenario Comparison

Compare lump-sum, dollar-cost averaging and a mixed strategy side by side.

Ad placeholder (leaderboard)
Enjoying the tools? Go Pro for £4.99 (one-time) and remove all ads — forever, on this device. Remove ads — £4.99

Compare three of the most common ways to put money to work — investing a lump sum all at once, dollar-cost averaging (DCA) the same amount in over many months, and a mixed approach that does some of each — on a single, identical market path. For any amount and horizon you get each strategy’s final value, total profit, effective annual growth rate (CAGR) and worst peak-to-trough drawdown, plotted together so the differences are obvious at a glance. It is built for anyone who has just received a windfall, a bonus, an inheritance or a pension transfer and is wrestling with the classic question: do I invest it all now, or feed it in gradually?

How it works

The tool builds one deterministic monthly return series from your two market assumptions — expected annual return and annual volatility. Each month gets a drift component (the expected return divided across the year) plus a random shock scaled by your volatility, generated from a seed derived from your inputs. Because the seed is fixed by the scenario, the path is fully reproducible: the same return, volatility and horizon always produce the same chart, and all three strategies are scored on that one shared path so the winner reflects method, not luck.

Each strategy is then simulated month by month. The lump sum is fully invested from month zero. DCA holds your capital as cash — earning the cash yield you specify — and buys an equal slice each month until the spread window closes, after which it simply rides the market. The mixed strategy invests your chosen upfront share immediately and drips the rest in over the same window. Throughout the run the tool tracks each portfolio’s total value, its worst drawdown, and the average share of capital actually exposed to the market, then reports the final values, profit, multiple and CAGR.

Example

Suppose you have £60,000 to invest over 15 years, assume a 7% return with 15% volatility, spread DCA over 24 months, and put 50% upfront in the mixed strategy. On a steadily rising path the lump sum typically ends ahead because every pound compounds for the full term, while DCA lands lower but with a noticeably smaller worst drawdown — the smoother-ride trade-off in numbers.

StrategyTime in marketTypical outcome
Lump sumHighestBest final value in rising markets, deepest drawdown
DCALowest early onLower final value, gentler drawdown, cheaper if prices dip first
MixedIn betweenA practical compromise between the two

Drop the upfront share to 0% and the mixed line tracks DCA exactly; raise it to 100% and it matches the lump sum — useful for finding a split you are comfortable holding. Every figure is calculated in your browser, and you can export the full month-by-month run to CSV.

Ad placeholder (rectangle)