AI incident post-mortem template
When an AI system leaks data, follows an injected instruction, or ships a harmful output, the worst response is an ad-hoc Slack thread that fades by Friday. A structured, blameless post-mortem turns the incident into durable prevention. This tool generates a ready-to-fill template tailored to AI-specific incidents — prompt injection, data exposure, harmful generation, model regression — so you capture the right things while memory is fresh.
How it works
You choose the incident type, list the affected systems, and note how it was discovered. The tool assembles a Markdown post-mortem skeleton with the standard sections — summary, impact, timeline, contributing factors, detection-gap analysis, remediation, and prevention — plus AI-specific prompts seeded from your inputs (for example, “was untrusted input able to reach a tool?” for an injection incident). You copy the Markdown into your own incident document and fill in the real detail. Everything runs locally in the browser.
Tips for a useful post-mortem
- Lead with the detection gap. The time between occurrence and detection is usually the highest-leverage metric — every prevention action should shorten it.
- Contributing factors are plural. Real incidents are never one cause; list every condition that had to be true, then address the cheapest ones first.
- Make actions owned and dated. A remediation list without an owner and a due date is a wish list. The template includes columns for both.
- Stay blameless. Write “the deploy had no canary” not “X forgot the canary”. Honest reporting is worth more than assigning blame.