Vector Database Cost Comparison

Compare hosting costs across Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, and pgvector.

Ad placeholder (leaderboard)

Vector database cost comparison

Choosing where to store your embeddings is partly a feature decision and partly a bill. This tool estimates the monthly cost of the same workload across four popular options — Pinecone, Weaviate Cloud, Qdrant Cloud, and self-hosted pgvector — from three inputs: how many vectors you store, their dimensionality, and how many queries you run per month.

How it works

First the tool computes raw storage as vectors × dimensions × 4 bytes for float32 embeddings, then adds about 30% for index and metadata overhead. Each provider applies its own model on top of that storage figure: a managed serverless service charges per gigabyte stored plus a per-query rate; pod-based pricing maps the storage tier to an instance fee; and pgvector is modelled as a flat managed Postgres instance whose cost barely moves with scale until you outgrow the box. The side-by-side table then ranks the monthly totals so you can see where the break-even points fall as your data and traffic grow.

Tips and notes

  • Dimensions dominate storage. Halving from 1536 to 768 dimensions nearly halves storage cost — quantization or smaller embedding models pay off fast at scale.
  • Query volume matters for serverless. Per-query pricing rewards spiky, low-traffic apps and punishes high-QPS workloads, where a pod or self-hosted setup wins.
  • pgvector is cheapest until it isn’t. It is the budget option for millions of vectors, but past tens of millions the index maintenance and recall trade-offs push teams toward purpose-built engines.
  • Estimates are local and editable. Refresh the inputs whenever provider list prices change.
Ad placeholder (rectangle)