See what semantic caching is worth before you build it
If your app answers similar questions over and over — support queries, FAQs, repeated lookups — many LLM calls are redundant. A semantic cache returns a stored answer when a new query is close enough in meaning to a previous one, skipping the model call entirely. This estimator models the saving from your own volume, hit rate and token sizes so you can decide whether caching is worth the engineering effort.
How it works
Every uncached request costs (input_tokens × input_price) + (output_tokens × output_price). A cache hit avoids that call completely, so it saves the full
per-call cost. The estimator multiplies your monthly request volume by your
cache hit rate to find how many calls are served from cache, then multiplies
that by the per-call cost to get the monthly saving. The result shows your bill
with and without the cache side by side, plus the percentage saved.
Tips for real-world caching
- Match savings to repetition. Caching pays off most when traffic is repetitive. Measure your actual similar-query rate before committing.
- Tune the similarity threshold. Too loose and you return wrong answers; too tight and your hit rate collapses. Validate against real queries.
- Set a TTL. Expire cached entries so answers stay fresh when your data or prompts change.
- Account for the cache’s own cost. Embeddings and storage add a small overhead — usually a fraction of the LLM call — so net savings are slightly below the headline figure here.