GPT-4o mini vs GPT-4o savings calculator
GPT-4o mini is roughly 15× cheaper than GPT-4o, so routing your simple, well-defined tasks to it while keeping hard reasoning on GPT-4o can slash a bill without hurting quality where it matters. This tool models that split: pick what fraction goes to mini and see the blended cost, the monthly savings, and the success-rate tradeoff side by side.
How it works
You give a single token profile and a split. The calculator prices each share at its own model’s rate and blends them:
mini_share = total × fraction
full_share = total × (1 − fraction)
blended = mini_share × mini_per_req + full_share × gpt4o_per_req
saving = all_gpt4o_cost − blended
The success-rate delta you enter is informational — it lets you weigh the dollars saved against any drop in task quality, since the cheapest blend is not worth it if mini fails the tasks you sent it.
Tips
- Route by task type, not randomly — classification, extraction and short rewrites are great for mini; multi-step reasoning should stay on GPT-4o.
- Add a fallback: if mini’s answer fails a validation check, retry on GPT-4o. The retry cost is small if mini handles most cases.
- Watch the success-rate delta — a 2-3 point drop on easy tasks is usually fine; a large drop means you are routing the wrong work to mini.
- Re-measure after prompt changes; a better prompt can let mini handle more.