Cost-to-Serve per Product Feature Dashboard

Attribute monthly LLM spend to each product feature for unit economics

Ad placeholder (leaderboard)

Cost-to-serve per product feature dashboard

A single “we spent X on the LLM API this month” number tells you nothing about where the money went. Unit economics demand feature-level attribution: which features are cheap, which are expensive, and which one feature is quietly eating half the bill. This dashboard breaks monthly LLM spend down per feature so you can prioritize cost-reduction work with data instead of guesswork.

How it works

Each feature has a token profile and a model. The monthly cost is:

feature_monthly = daily_calls × 30
                × [ (input_tokens / 1e6) × input_price
                  + (output_tokens / 1e6) × output_price ]

The dashboard sums every feature into a total, then shows each feature’s cost and its percentage of that total, sorted from most to least expensive. Because each feature carries its own model, you can model a realistic product where cheap features run on a small model and a few premium features run on a frontier model.

Tips and notes

The breakdown almost always follows a power law — one or two features dominate. Attack the largest share first; a 20% cut on the top feature beats eliminating three small ones. The reliable levers, in order: route to a cheaper model where quality holds, trim the prompt (drop unused few-shot examples and verbose system text), cache repeated or near-identical calls, and batch where latency allows. After each change, re-run the dashboard to verify spend actually fell — assumptions about token counts are frequently wrong until you measure. Pair this with the LLM API cost calculator to model a single feature in more depth before rolling a change out.

Ad placeholder (rectangle)