Transcription Model Comparison

Compare Whisper, Deepgram, AssemblyAI, Rev.ai for STT

Ad placeholder (leaderboard)

Compare speech-to-text models at a glance

Choosing a transcription API means balancing accuracy, language coverage, real-time vs batch support, speaker diarization, and price per minute. This table puts the major speech-to-text models side by side — OpenAI Whisper, Deepgram, AssemblyAI, Rev.ai, Google, and Azure — so you can pick the right model for captions, meeting notes, call analytics, or media transcription.

How to read the table

  • WER is approximate word error rate on clean English audio; lower is better.
  • Languages is the number of supported languages.
  • Real-time flags whether the API supports low-latency streaming for live captioning, versus batch-only async transcription.
  • Diarization flags built-in speaker labelling.
  • $/min is a list-price estimate per audio minute; add-on models can cost more.

Filter by real-time requirement and budget, search by model name, and click a column header to sort.

Tips for picking a model

  • For live captions and voice agents, prioritise the real-time streaming providers — Deepgram and AssemblyAI lead on latency and accuracy.
  • For bulk media or podcast transcription, batch APIs like Whisper and Rev.ai are cost-effective and accuracy is excellent on clean audio.
  • For meetings and call analytics, make sure diarization and word-level timestamps are supported.
  • If privacy or cost at scale dominates, self-hosting open Whisper removes per-minute fees but you pay for GPU compute and operate the pipeline yourself.
Ad placeholder (rectangle)