Compare AI coding assistants at a glance
Choosing an AI coding tool means weighing IDE support, the model backend, how much codebase context it can use, price, and whether it offers an offline or self-hosted privacy mode. This table puts the major assistants side by side — Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Continue, Cody, Windsurf, Codeium, and more — so you can pick the right pair-programmer for your stack and policy constraints.
How to read the table
- IDE is which editors the tool supports — VS Code, JetBrains, its own fork, or multiple.
- Model backend is which LLMs power it; tools that let you bring your own model are the most flexible.
- Context is a 1–5 rating of codebase-wide awareness, from single-file completions to full-repo agents.
- Privacy mode flags whether you can run it offline or self-host for code that cannot leave your network.
- $/mo is a per-developer list estimate for the paid individual tier.
Filter by privacy requirement and budget, search by tool name, and click a column header to sort.
Tips for picking a tool
- For agentic multi-file refactors, Cursor and Windsurf lead with deep indexing and autonomous edit modes.
- For a lightweight completion layer in your existing editor, GitHub Copilot and Codeium are fast and inexpensive.
- For strict privacy or air-gapped environments, Continue and Tabby run fully local against your own models — no code leaves your machine.
- Match the model backend to your needs: tools that let you point at Claude, GPT, or a local model give you control over quality, cost, and data residency.