Return on Equity (ROE) is one of the most widely cited profitability ratios in financial analysis. It answers a deceptively simple question: how much profit does the company earn for every pound (or dollar) of shareholders’ equity? Yet behind that single percentage lies a rich anatomy of operational efficiency, asset intensity, and financial structure — all of which this calculator exposes through three progressively detailed modes: a quick basic calculation, a classic DuPont 3-factor decomposition, and the extended DuPont 5-factor model.
How it works
Basic mode implements the textbook definition:
ROE = Net Income / Average Shareholders’ Equity
Average equity is the mean of opening and closing equity for the year. Using the average removes the distortion of large share buybacks or capital raises that occur mid-year. If you only have one balance-sheet snapshot, use end-of-year equity and the calculator will apply it directly.
DuPont 3-factor mode decomposes ROE into three multiplicative drivers:
ROE = Net Profit Margin x Asset Turnover x Equity Multiplier
where Net Profit Margin = NI / Revenue, Asset Turnover = Revenue / Assets, and the Equity Multiplier = Assets / Equity. This factorisation reveals which lever is driving (or dragging) the headline ROE: a retailer with a thin 2% margin can still post a strong ROE if it turns its asset base 8 times a year; a capital-heavy manufacturer may post the same ROE on a fat 15% margin but only 0.6x asset turnover.
DuPont 5-factor mode extends the analysis by splitting net profit margin into three sub-components:
ROE = Tax Burden x Interest Burden x EBIT Margin x Asset Turnover x Equity Multiplier
where Tax Burden = NI / EBT (net income divided by pre-tax income, closer to 1 means a lower effective tax rate), Interest Burden = EBT / EBIT (pre-tax income divided by operating income, closer to 1 means lower interest costs), and EBIT Margin = EBIT / Revenue. This five-way split lets analysts isolate exactly how much of a company’s ROE improvement came from, say, a lower corporate tax rate versus better operating leverage.
Worked example
Consider Acme Ltd with the following annual figures:
| Line item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Net Income | £120,000 |
| Revenue | £1,500,000 |
| Total Assets | £1,200,000 |
| Shareholders’ Equity (year-end) | £800,000 |
Basic ROE: £120,000 / £800,000 = 15.0% — sits in the “good” tier.
DuPont 3-factor breakdown:
- Net Profit Margin = £120,000 / £1,500,000 = 8.0%
- Asset Turnover = £1,500,000 / £1,200,000 = 1.25x
- Equity Multiplier = £1,200,000 / £800,000 = 1.5x
- ROE = 8.0% x 1.25 x 1.5 = 15.0% (identity confirmed)
The leverage multiple is only 1.5x, so this company is not particularly levered. The ROE is earned primarily through decent asset utilisation and a reasonable margin rather than financial engineering — a healthier result than the headline number might suggest.
Now suppose a competitor posts the same 15% ROE but with a 3% margin, 1.0x asset turnover, and a 5.0x equity multiplier. Both pass the 15% threshold, but Acme’s ROE is far more sustainable — the competitor is relying on heavy debt to mask thin profitability.
Every calculation runs entirely in your browser — no financial data is ever transmitted or stored.