Expert panel prompt builder
Some questions have no single right answer — they have tradeoffs that look different depending on who you ask. The classic way to surface those tradeoffs is to put several experts in a room and let them argue. This builder produces a prompt that makes an LLM play multiple expert personas at once, each reasoning from their own discipline and incentives, so you see the full landscape of a question instead of one flattened answer.
How it works
You define the question, the roster of experts (each with a title and specialty), the number of exchange turns, and the moderation style. The tool assembles a prompt that assigns the model each persona explicitly, tells it to keep their voices and priorities genuinely distinct, and instructs them to push back on each other where they truly disagree. With a synthesizing moderator, the prompt adds a final role that weighs the arguments and delivers a reasoned conclusion. The result reads like a transcript of a real panel, with the disagreements left intact rather than smoothed over.
Tips and example
Pick experts whose incentives naturally conflict — a security engineer and a growth lead will surface tension a panel of three product managers never would. Keep it to three to five voices and two to three turns; beyond that the discussion repeats. A useful example: question “should we open-source our core library?”, experts “a senior open-source maintainer, a CFO, and a competitive strategist,” three turns, synthesizing moderation. The maintainer argues for community, the CFO for monetization, the strategist for moats — and the moderator’s synthesis is where your real decision input comes from. Treat the output as structured brainstorming, and verify any load-bearing fact yourself.